“Gödel, Escher, Bach” author Douglas Hofstadter fears AI



summary
Summary

A new niche has emerged in the AI ​​hype: The “AI doomer,” who predicts a bleak future for humanity based on current AI developments. This niche is gaining a prominent figure.

Renowned cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter is on the side of the AI ​​doomers and sees major, less favorable changes coming for humanity. He cites the rapid evolution of AI systems since the emergence of the first systems like Deep Blue, which achieved goals that previously seemed unattainable, such as beating Garry Kasparov at chess or becoming a Go champion.

“And then systems got better and better at translation between languages, and then at producing intelligible responses to difficult questions in natural language, and even writing poetry, “Hofstadter points out.

This development, he says, shook his belief system that machines would not become significantly smarter than humans any time soon.

ad

“It felt as if not only are my belief systems collapsing, but it feels as if the entire human race is going to be eclipsed and left in the dust soon. People ask me, “What do you mean by ‘soon’?”

And I don’t know what I really mean. I don’t have any way of knowing. But some part of me says 5 years, some part of me says 20 years, some part of me says, “I don’t know, I have no idea.” But the progress, the accelerating progress, has been so unexpected, so completely caught me off guard, not only myself but many, many people, that there is a certain kind of terror of an oncoming tsunami that is going to catch all humanity off guard .”

Douglas Hofstadter

Hofstadter sees the outcome of this development as uncertain. He sees the possibility that an overpowering AI will wipe out humanity. Otherwise, humanity may seem like a small phenomenon compared to something much more intelligent and as incomprehensible to us as humans are to cockroaches.

AI depresses Douglas Hofstadter

Hofstadter has done fundamental research in artificial intelligence, particularly in the area of ​​”fluid concepts and creative analogies,” where he studies the ability of machines to think and learn by analogy, much like humans transfer ideas from one context to another.

By his own account, he never believed that a neural network that works only in a forward direction could do deep thinking. Hofstadter says it doesn’t make sense to him, and that just shows he was naive.

“And it overwhelms me and depresses me in a way that I haven’t been depressed for a very long time,” Hofstadter says. The human mind might not, after all, be as deep and complex as he imagined when he wrote the books “Gödel, Escher, Bach” and “I am a strange loop.”

“It makes me feel, in some sense, like a very imperfect, flawed structure compared with these computational systems that have, you know, a million times or a billion times more knowledge than I have and are a bilion times faster,” Hofstadter says .

Recommendation

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top